What’s Happening in Ramsgate & Margate this summer? 2015

6 weeks of school holiday just isn’t enough to fit it all in. I have just updated my own page of See & Do in Thanet which you can find via the top  tabs or click HERE.

I use this myself to try and plan what we’ll be doing. Considering we live at the coast we spend very little time at our local beaches, like I said the holiday just isn’t long enough.

Anyway. Looking ahead to September we will have the very first 3 day Comedy Festival in Margate. I think it’s going to be brilliant. I will be at One For The Ladies at Bernie’s Choc Bar on Friday 25th. Here is a film about the event:

And we want to try to get to Ellington Park in Ramsgate on Sundays as there is lots happening there.

http://www.friendsofellingtonpark.org.uk/category/fundraising-events

And good photo in Gazette here: http://www.thanetgazette.co.uk/Ramsgate-s-Ellington-Park-set-summer-outdoor/story-26850616-detail/story.html

I notice the Gazette say the music is at 4-6pm but I think it is at 2pm because Friends of Ellington Park must be right and they say 2-4pm.

The Rights & Wrongs of Too Many Clothes – the Naked Rambler and SAS v The European Court

Humans are the only species on this planet that cover their natural bodies in manufactured clothing. A million years of evolution and our skin, with its covering of fine short hair, is not up to the job, it seems. How would Darwin explain that one? It’s a rhetorical question but I can imagine creationists may have an answer:

If the good lord had intended us to go naked she wouldn’t have created sunburn and skin cancer.

On the whole, UK law is fairly sensible and there is no law against going nude, no legislation to say we must wear clothes in public places. That is why I’ve seen a whole lot of Stephen Gough, otherwise known as the naked rambler. I’ve seen him many times and mostly naked except for sensible footwear. It seems he was born in the wrong time and place, he’d have been right at home in ancient Greece. Or actually anywhere for most of human history. Or even in some other parts of the world now. The social taboos and culture around decent dress are limited in human history.

In case you are unfamiliar with the Naked Rambler’s story in 2004 he walked, without clothes, from Land’s End to John O’Groats.

Of course, he makes great TV (of the channel 4 or 5 variety). When I say i’ve see him, I mean on my TV. I’ve never met him, in the flesh. I’ve deliberately watched documentaries about this crazy anarchic libertarian. For many reasons, not least I admire people who are willing to stand out from the crowd for their beliefs. Mr Gough does more than this, however, he challenges and exposes some of the tensions in the UK between individual freedom and law and order.

It is worth repeating:

  • It is not illegal to be naked in a public place in the UK.
  • We are all wearing clothes due to social convention and possibly peer pressure (and the weather, of course).

Unfortunately, life went downhill for him and he has spent most of the last decade in prison essentially because he insists on taking his clothes off, in public places. He has been charged with the common law offense of “outraging public decency”, breach of the peace and served with civil anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs).

To spend the greater part of a decade of your life in prison for doing something that is not illegal, for simply walking around naked, does seem a bit harsh.

So Mr Gough took a case to the European Court of Human Rights claiming the UK government was restricting his freedom of self expression in contravention of European Convention on Human Rights, which was drafted in 1950, long before the European Common Market (EEC) or the EU. Note, the European Court of Human Rights was established by the Council of Europe in 1950s, it is nothing to do with the European Union. Leaving the EU, or not, makes no difference to our relationship with the Council of Europe and Human Rights.

I have been to the Court in Strasbourg and had the privilege of sitting in on a hearing in the 1990s. It was fascinating.

It is impressive that 47 countries have signed up to this process whereby a case can be considered by a bunch of judges, as many as seventeen at a time. The judges are independent experts from each of the 47 countries, so they have both great experience but no vested interest in the outcome of a case. They do not make laws but only consider each issue in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights. Judgements relate to this and only this.

The Court’s function is to ensure the enforcement and implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR drafted in 1950, as a direct consequence of the atrocities committed in Europe in 1940s).

Among other things the convention:

  • Protects the right to life.
  • Prohibits torture and “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”
  • Countries may not deport people who might be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in the recipient state
  • Prohibits slavery and forced labour
  • Demands the right to a fair trial (the McLibel trial is very interesting in relation to this one).
  • Right to respect for private and family life
  • Right to freedom of thought & religion
  • Right to freedom of expression

The European Convention on Human Rights  is not essentially controversial. The UK government is signed up to it (and at the time was instrumental in writing it) and, in recent statements about repeal of the UK Human Rights Act, the current conservative government expressed support for the Convention and has reaffirmed its intention to remain a member of the Council of Europe.

It is notable that the government has won in the vast majority of cases against the UK, which means overall our society is very good at protecting those basic rights and freedoms that we take for granted.

Some examples of the UK losing:

  • Aslef, a trade union should be free to decide who can join. Ie can exclude people with opposing views such as BNP & NF members.
  • Spycatcher, when the UK government wanted to gag our newspapers from reporting on a book that was available for purchase all over the world except in England & Wales.
  • Not all convicted prisoners should be denied the right to vote.

In total contrast to going bare what about completely covering up?

I was very interested to follow a French case in recent years. in 2011 France outlawed full face coverings in public. If you want to rob a bank in that country you can’t wear a balaclava or a crash helmet. As soon as the law was introduced in 2011 a woman (SAS) applied to the court to defend her right to religious freedom, freedom of expression and the freedom to a private family life. The French had taken the bold step of banning the full veil, the niqab.

I couldn’t imagine such a ban in the UK where we expect to be able to wear anything (or even nothing) and we are very tolerant of other people whether they are eccentric or religious or both.  It seems a very anti-British rule, no wonder we were always at war with the French.

On the other hand I could see that the new law wasn’t a bad idea. If you are not about to mug someone at the cash point machine, why completely cover your face in a way that can frighten and intimidate others? Seeing the full face of other people is reassuring and a part of social interaction. In relation to the full veil covering the face of women, i am pleased we do not live in a society where that is the norm and note that such headgear is associated with societies that discriminate against women rather than support full gender equality.

In 2014 the Court delivered its ruling upholding the French law. Two judges held the minority view that her religious freedom was breached by the ban but all unanimously agreed that the lady had not suffered discrimination because the ban was not sole enforced on against religious or cultural garments but all full face coverings. In conclusion, the French government won and the law is still in place because showing our full face as part of living together as a social group is legitimate.

In the UK you can still walk around totally covered up from head to toe like the Stig or a ghost of the white bed sheet variety but when you cross to Calais you must alter your costume.

In 2014 the Court also delivered its decision on the naked rambler’s case, he did not win. I’m no lawyer so my interpretation may not be quite accurate but it seems similar to the French. It is legitimate for the state to curb an individual’s freedom to dress in as much or as little as s/he pleases in the interest of us living together as a social group. It doesn’t matter that the nudity of the naked man is not illegal, it is antisocial, it might upset or alarm other people and so the state is right to protect us from repetitive antisocial conduct.
Personally I don’t agree with every decision arrived at in the European Court of Human Rights, but what is marvelous about this institution is that a whole bunch of independent experts will consider the issue and evidence in relation to a clearly defined and agreed set of Human Rights.

The repeal of the Human Rights Act

Finally, the current government propose to scrap the UK Human Rights Act, I think this is about politics. About being seen to repeal laws passed by a Labour government and being seen to keep British courts free of European influence. The Human Rights Act came in in the late 1990s, the European Convention in the 1950s.

The repeal of the Human Rights Act will have

no impact on our rights

as long as the UK remain committed to the Council of Europe and the European Convention.

Jazz Festival in Ramsgate this weekend.

One of the good things about living by the seaside in Thanet, is the many great events that happen locally over the summer. I can’t get to them all, even though they’re on my doorstep.

10-11-12th July brings the annual Jazz event of Ramsgate. The Seaside Shuffle is a traditional Jazz event and includes some morning/lunchtime free music on all three days.

ramsgate jazz

THE IMMIGRANT EXPERIENCE

Originally posted on thanetwatch:

PILGRIM STATE BOOK

An extraordinary book about the immigration experience gets its launch in Thanet this Saturday.

The book, Pilgrim State, published by Hodder, is written by Jackie Walker, who first moved to Broadstairs five years ago.

In 1960s Deptford seven-year-old Jackie got a crash course in racism.

“You smell wog,” said a little blonde girl she thought was going to be her friend. “Don’t you ever come near me.”

When it was first published in 2008 Guardian called the book: “a survival tale to warm the chilliest heart.”

It tells how Jackie’s family came to this country from Jamaica in the 1950s.

Jackie’s mother Dorothy had an abusive father and experienced recurring mental illness, poverty and racial discrimination.

But she set out to keep her family together – and, despite all the odds, she did.

Says Jackie: “People become immigrants to improve their lives. And while they do that, they improve the…

View original 84 more words

I’ve chopped the children’s heads off & Car Parking Chilton School

Quick recap.

On Friday morning all parents receive a text message from the school reminding them to park legally due to the reoccurring problem of children almost hit by cars in this street – often cars driving on the pavement. Requests like this are frequently sent to parents via the school newsletter.

All of the photos published on my blog over the past few days were taken after that text was sent out.

Having spoken to drivers I have discovered that many do not know what they are doing wrong.

  • Driving on the pavement is not allowed!
  • Parking on the pavement is not allowed.
  • Waiting on a single yellow or double yellow line (at these times) is not allowed.

These are the rules, backed by laws. I didn’t make the rules but most parents stick to them, most of the time, and children’s safety is put at risk by those who don’t.

Will I Remove the PHOTOs?

If there is a particular issue of child safety (or even parent safety). I will be honest, I wasn’t thinking about the issue of child protection and not identifying children in relation to the school and that might cause problems for some children in a totally unrelated way. I offer an unreserved apology for any distress caused if such a case has been inadvertently snapped in my photos.

Hence, I’ve blanked out the children that now appear on my blog. All of the photos of the cars parked are subject to copyright so it is illegal for anyone else to reproduce them without permission, it is illegal to copy them and circulate them on Facebook, for example. If anyone has done that, they should delete them.

But What About the Cars?

I would be very pleased to remove all of the photos and the registration numbers listed if the drivers stop parking in this way at this time of day. I’d be delighted to hear from anyone about this. Is it too much for me to ask you to put it in writing?

How can you contact me?

Well, can you leave a message at the end of this blog. Messages are moderated so they will not be published automatically, unless you have had a message approved by me before.

Reflections

I have learnt something over the past few days. I assumed the rogue drivers were arrogant, shameless and inconsiderate or just a little thoughtless. I realise now there is a minority of people who do not think they are doing anything wrong.

As many as 1 in 6 adults might not be able to read what I have written, even if they can find their photo on my website. So please talk to people help raise awareness that:

  • There is no stopping, no waiting and no parking on a single yellow line (at this time).
  • Driving on the pavement is illegal and dangerous.
  • Parking on the pavement is not allowed.

Those are the reasons that so many of us, residents and parents, feel so angry about the people who park illegally in Chilton Lane.

They are sometimes there for 10 minutes and often for 45 minutes. They believe they are entitled to park there and are indignant that I have photographed their car.

Other people have been photographing cars too, taking registrations etc. I would encourage them to continue.

IMG_1818

Rogues Gallery ~ illegal parking outside Chilton School, Pegwell, Ramsgate

The two men in the photos below think they are entitled to park on a single yellow line at 3.05 or 3.10pm outside a school to pick up children. The school ends 3.15.

I AM delighted to tell you that parking on the pavement outside this school seems to have come to an abrupt end only days after I starting publishing the photos of offender on this website. So photos referred to have been removed.

  • Parking on the yellow line was not the only driving offence.
  • illegally driving on the pavement
  • parking on the pavement and
  • causing an obstruction of the highway.

The vast majority of us know that is unacceptable. It is dangerous, antisocial, selfish, inconsiderate behaviour, in my opinion. Whether you agree with me or not the law is on my side.

The first man pictured below wound down his window to speak to me when he saw me take a photo of the street.

His opening gambit was to tell me that I need permission to take a photograph of his vehicle.

This is not true. If you are on a public street and not trespassing you can take a photograph of anything you can see: houses, gardens, cars parked illegally on the pavement outside of a school, adults and even children.

So I took a photo of him sitting in his car. I’ll try to get a better picture if I see him there again.

BTW, not only that, but you can publish any of these pictures as leaflets, posters, in a book or on the interweb.

Next he demanded to know whether I am the woman who calls the police.

“No, I’m not. But why shouldn’t I? You are illegally parked causing a menace to pedestrians at a busy time of day.” That’s what I said but I could have added: Most people do not park like this and most people disapprove of your behaviour. So there is no reason to think there is only one person calling the police and raising objections.

I began to explain that parking in that way is dangerous but he dismissed this as ridiculous so I saw no reason to continue talking to the man as other cars were stopping. More car drivers I could talk to and take photos of.

His parked car can be seen here. He was there at least 10 minutes before the end of school so he could park immediately next to the school markings and be closest to the gate.

The second man was more polite but was quite adamant that he was entitled to drive on to the pavement and park there, regardless of the yellow line. He also arrived in plenty of time. Look he’s parked right behind Mr-R-U-The-Woman-Who-Calls-The-Police.

Note:  there is plenty of FREE parking within 3 minutes walk of this location.

Hard to believe but these men seemed to sincerely thinks it is OK to:

  • drive on to the pavement,
  • park on the pavement causing a menace to pedestrians,
  • block the road so it is reduced to single lane traffic at the busiest time of day
  • and park on a yellow line in contravention of the the yellow line regulations.

It seems the guardians, grandparents, carers of children at the school are in great need of education. What a poor example they set to the children they are collecting.

I took photographs of many more cars. I only spoke to 3 other drivers were considerably more humble because they knew they were in the wrong.

Finally, I can imagine that these men and other people are not pleased to see themselves appearing in my blog and they may well want to know how to get their photos removed. In taking them and publishing them I have broken no rules and no laws and there is nothing libellous on my blog.

If you want to contact me about removing your image you should consider exactly why you don’t want a photo of your car parked illegally published on this website or wherever else I might choose to publish it.

A little update: I’ve had overwhelming support and in just a few days. Most parents are dismayed at the dangerous situation outside this school, many have witnessed a near miss, some of these incidents are reported to the school and the school have reported them to parents. Yet still we get people like this lady, I call her Ms-Do-You-Know-What-Harassment-Means who expects to stop on the pavement outside school.

Here is a new photo of what the street looks like at peak dropping off time just a week later – yes it really is that clear of traffic!

IMG_1815

Finally

There are many more pictures and details about my two conversations with this lady here: http://mrstaraplumbing.com/2015/06/12/parking-outside-schools-and-road-traffic-accidents/

And details of the rules as applicable to Chilton Lane here: http://mrstaraplumbing.com/2015/06/13/rules-for-parking-outside-chilton-school-in-ramsgate-kent-on-the-pavement-on-a-single-yellow-line/

Rules for Parking outside Chilton school in Ramsgate Kent, on the pavement, on a single yellow line.

Some people think they are entitled to park on Chilton Lane, Ramsgate, Kent

to drop off or pick up children. They are WRONG.

It is ONLY a single yellow on Chilton Lane so the drivers think they can stop there. It is permissible to stop for passengers to get in or alight and for loading on a single or double yellow line, there is no waiting or parking time allowed.

But

  • outside Chilton School in Ramsgate, the rogue drivers are mounting the pavement, which is illegal.
  • and parking on the pavement, also an offence.
  • causing obstruction to both pedestrians and other drivers.

https://www.gov.uk/waiting-and-parking/waiting-and-parking-238

Parking Rules Applicable to Chilton School in School Hours

Double and Single Yellow Lines: (Highway Code 238)

The rules clearly state no waiting. Parking on these lines for five or ten minutes before school ends clearly constitutes waiting. In the written rules there is no time period allowed for stopping, parking or waiting on yellow lines, despite many drivers’ misconceptions. At the relevant times you may only stop to load, unload, pick up or set down passengers.

Theoretically, therefore, parents could drive by and stop to drop off or pick up their children on a road with a single or double yellow line. Outside Chilton School, however, there are other regulations applicable to Chilton Lane.

Parents may only stop on Chilton Lane to drop off or collect children at these times if they:

  • do not drive on to the pavement,
  • do not stop on the pavement,
  • do not obstruct people walking along the pavement and vehicles moving along the road.

Whereas drivers are

  • mounting the pavement, which is illegal.
  • parking on the pavement, also an offence.
  • causing obstruction to both pedestrians and other drivers.

The drivers who park on the double yellows on the junction of Saxon Road and Chilton Lane are also committing a number of offences and they have a significant impact on the safe crossing with the crossing lady.

Drivers should NOT:

  • Drive on the pavement

You MUST NOT drive on or over a pavement, footpath or bridleway except to gain lawful access to property, or in the case of an emergency.” Highway Code, RTA 1988 sect 34. It is also illegal under Highways Act 1832 S72.

  • Park on the pavement

“Parking on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or pushchairs.” Highway code 244

  • Obstruction of the Road & Pavement (collectively the “Highway”)

“If a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine…” Highways Act 1980 S137.

“You MUST NOT leave your vehicle or trailer in a dangerous position or where it causes any unnecessary obstruction of the road.” Highway Code 242 RTA 1988 , sect 22.

“No person in charge of a motor vehicle or trailer shall cause or permit the vehicle to stand on a road so as to cause any unnecessary obstruction of the road.” The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 R103.


The Silent Killer at Home Carbon Monoxide free ebook by D Percy from smashwords

Gas Safety In the Home ebook by D Percy

Gas Safety In the Home ebook by Deborah Percy FREE at smashwords.com

Buy my books

Available at Amazon / Kindle. You can order print copies from this website or Amazon. The Landlord's Guide and Carbon Monoxide are both in print now. Coming soon (in 2014) Do Gas Fires Make you Sick?

Mrs Tara Plumbing’s books at Amazon.co.uk

buy books at Amazon.co.uk

Landlords & Gas Safety book

Landlords & Gas Safety book

Landlord's Guide to Gas Safety available in all ebook stores

All plumbing questions here at the UKPF

mumsnet

mumsnet

Gas Safety Week sept

thanetbloglist.co.uk

”thanetbloglist.co.uk

RSS tara heating

  • Questions about my Boiler & Central Heating October 6, 2014
    Many questions about gas boilers and central heating are answered on the various pages of the Tara Heating website.  I have re-written it this year, but if you have unanswered questions let me know.http://taraheating.co.uk/installations/faqs

RSS Eastcliff Richard

RSS Carbon Monoxide CO blog

  • Gas fires are dangerous October 31, 2014
    Not all of them but research from various places continues to suggest that 1 in 3 is not properly installed or not properly maintained. Worth thinking about as winter is on its way. You would not drive a car for … Continue reading →

RSS Garden Geek

  • Let’s bring back the mighty boiled egg! June 21, 2015
    One of the simplest things you can cook is a boiled egg. It really does sound pretty boring but imagine the perfectly cooked boiled... The post Let’s bring back the mighty boiled egg! appeared first on GardenGeek.Net.

RSS Bathroom Etiquette blog site

  • Etiquette, Shame and The Huffington Post May 25, 2014
    I was a guest on HuffPost Live this week in a segment purporting to discuss the ins and out of workplace bathroom etiquette. We’ve been here before, but it seems like bathroom etiquette at work is the hot topic that just won’t go away. It was one of those slightly awkward four-way video chats but […]

Mrs TP’s latest tweets….

(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) })(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-49499672-1', 'mrstaraplumbing.com'); ga('send', 'pageview');

Trust:

RSS UKIP in Thanet

  • UKIP in Thanet District Council promise to reopen Manston Airport
    or at least they did before the election. It almost sounded too easy. Well, it’s too early to comment on progress but it it not looking so easy.    
  • Thanet District Council tackle Dog Poo
    I’m sure the overwhelming majority of residents will be pleased if UKIP can get on top of the dog poo problem. There is no easy solution as councils around the country have tried to tackle this with the Keep Britain Tidy campaign for at least 30 years (that I know of). One council tried Doggie Loos […]
  • We have a UKIP Thanet District Council but a Conservative MP
    For those who enjoy the maths behind the headlines or have been enjoying #thanetrigged I can share with you this extract from a much larger spreadsheet of results. In the South Thanet parliamentary constituency there are two wards that are part of Dover District Council (by the way Dover are responsible for elections in that […]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers